More about Esperanto

Esperanto is a language different from most in that it was carefully planned to be as easy-as-possible to learn. It was introduced with the hope that it would be studied worldwide, and become a common second language for everyone.


1.       The grammar is simple, with no exceptions. The entire set of Esperanto grammar rules can be mastered in a single hour.  There is one simple rule for making plurals. A student of English has to learn a list of rules, exceptions to the rules and a number of words that don’t follow any of the rules. (See note below – Making Plurals in English.) Every Esperanto verb follows the same simple pattern; there are no irregular verbs requiring additional learning. English verb patterns are also simple, but there are hundreds of irregular verbs, meaning hundreds of more words to learn. (e.g. break, broke, broken; do, did, done; drink, drank, drunk; see, saw, seen; …)

3.       The spelling is completely phonetic, and the syllabic stress in consistent. Once you have learned the rules, if you see a word correctly spelled, you know how to pronounce it. No additional learning is required. After learning the basic rules for pronouncing most letters, a student of English is still faced with hundreds if not thousands of complexities. (e.g. There are seven different ways of pronouncing “ough”, none phonetic; there are thirteen different ways of spelling the long “o” sound; impossible is stressed on the second syllable; possibility is stressed on the third syllable; …)

4.       Vocabulary learning has been greatly reduced by extensively using compound words, prefixes, suffixes and grammatical endings. Thousands of words are required to be fluent in any language, including Esperanto. In most languages that means learning thousands of vocabulary items. But in Esperanto thousands of words are formed from only hundreds of vocabulary items. This means fluency can be achieved after a small fraction of the learning required for fluency in other languages. Ninety five percent of spoken Esperanto can be understood after mastering less than 500 vocabulary items. (To better understand this visit the page “Word-building in Esperanto”.)


1.       English is a hard language to learn. Esperanto is much, much easier.

2.       Many English sentences can be misunderstood, as multiple interpretations are often possible. Esperanto is far less ambiguous.

3.       English is politically associated with the United States and the former British Empire. Esperanto is a neutral language intended for all humanity and not connected with any one political power.

4.       English is the native language of about 5% of the world’s population.  Using English an international language means that if people who do not speak English want to communicate internationally, they have to commit a considerable amount of time and resources to learn English. If they want to bridge language barriers, they have to build the entire huge bridge themselves – native speakers of English don’t need to put in any time or resources. Esperanto is more fair. It can be thought of as a much smaller bridge, that is built with much less effort. The bridge is built from both sides which meet in the middle. 


A huge amount of resources is currently being spent on translations and interpretation which would be freed up for better uses if Esperanto were a common second language for everyone. As an example, since 1998, all documents of the World Health Organization meeting defined criteria have been made available in all six of its official languages. Despite the effort, half of the world’s population do not understand any of the six official languages. Translations cost millions of dollars every year. With Esperanto as a common second language those millions would be available for health-related projects.

When someone who speaks a major language has a good idea, it can be quickly communicated and adopted where it proves useful. How many good ideas never reach the broader world community because the person with the idea does not speak a major language? How often is a scientist chosen to attend international conferences because his or her language skills are superior to a colleague whose is a more proficient scientist?  

People often learn a second language because they are interested in the culture of the language they learn. But most people who learn English are not motivated by an interest in the culture of the English speaking world. They are motivated by a desire to communicate internationally. An unintended side effect is their access to English culture. While there have been many foreign works translated into English, English literature has largely been written by native speakers of English and represents the culture of the English speaking world. Using English as an international language with the resulting disproportionate exposure to its culture can be viewed as threatening to other cultures. Esperanto speaking authors from around the world contribute an abundance of original work to Esperanto literature which represents the international culture of the Esperanto speaking world. Esperanto literature is without question the most internationally representative literature of any language on the planet.  

Many literary works originally written in other languages have been translated into English. Accurately translating from one language into another is not an easy task. Competent, trained, professional translators who have mastered both the original language and English, can produce translations of very high quality. However most works translated into English have not been translated by trained professionals and the quality of the translations are often less than ideal. Translations into Esperanto are usually done by people translating from their native language who often understand nuances and subtleties that might be missed by someone translating from a foreign language. The word building possibilities of Esperanto and clear but flexible sentence structure make it much easier to translate with high fidelity to the original.

Learning Esperanto is a demonstration of respect. Although much easier than other languages, learning Esperanto still requires an effort. Making that effort proves a willingness to reach out to meet others as equals. This respect for other people and other cultures provides a good grounding for the international cooperation required to address the many global challenges facing our world.

Read the Prague Manifesto for additional arguments in favour of Esperanto.

Check our page Internet Resources for links to other websites.



Making Plurals in English

Major rules

  • For most nouns – add an “s”.
  • For nouns ending in ch, o, s, sh, x, or z – add “es”.
  • For nouns ending in “f” or “fe” – change the ending to “ves”.
  • For nouns ending in a “y” – change the “y” to “i” and add “es”.

Exceptions to the above rules:

  • Some nouns don’t change at all. (deer, deer)
  • Some nouns ending in “o” don’t need the “e”. (volcanos and volcanoes are both correct) 
  • For some nouns ending in “o” it is a mistake to add the “e”. (piano, pianos – not pianoes).
  • Sometimes a final “s” or “z” is doubled before adding “es”. (gas, gasses)
  • Some nouns ending in “f” don’t need to be changed. (hoofs and hooves are both correct)
  • For some nouns ending in “f”, it is a mistake to change the ending. (chief, chiefs – not chieves)
  • For nouns ending in a vowel plus “y”, just add “s”. (monkey, monkeys) 

Minor rules for making plurals in English

  • Nouns ending in “is” often change to “es”. (analysis, analyses)
  • Nouns ending in “on” often change to “a” (criterion, criteria)
  • Nouns with a “oo” in the singular often change to a “ee” in the plural. (foot, feet)
  • Nouns ending in “ouse” often change to “ice”. (mouse, mice)
  • Nouns ending in “us” often change to “i”. (cactus, cacti) 

Learning all the above rules and exceptions is not enough. There are still other nouns who plurals are different words that needs to be learned separately. (child, children; person, people; …)